Level 2 LEVEL 2: EARLY DEVELOPMENT

User Understanding

LLM-Driven Semantic Profiling for High-Stakes Personalization

Beyond Match Scores

Traditional algorithmic matching is obsolete. The keyword-based systems dominating recruitment and the collaborative filtering engines powering dating apps suffer from fundamental semantic failures and bias amplification.

The New Architecture

User Understanding represents a paradigm shift: a three-stage, LLM-driven framework comprising Semantic Profile Generation, Pairwise Trade-off Analysis, and Personalized Semantic Filtering. This is the state-of-the-art approach for high-stakes, nuanced matching across domains from precision medicine to legal technology.

Dating Apps
The Bias Amplification Engine

Collaborative Filtering doesn't understand why users make choices—it only observes them. The result: implicit biases become systemic, deepening racial and physical homogeneity.

The Problem
Misaligned Incentives

Algorithms optimized for engagement and revenue, not relationship success

Recruitment
The Semantic Failure

99% of Fortune 500 companies use keyword-matching ATS systems that can't equate "Product Lead" with "Product Manager" or understand equivalent experiences.

False Negative Rate
Up to 75%

Qualified candidates rejected due to rigid keyword matching

The Understanding Vector

User Understanding is not a single score—it's a multi-dimensional latent vector across four key domains:

Stable Traits

Big Five personality recognition from free-text

Transient States

Multi-label emotion detection (Ekman/Plutchik)

Immediate Goals

Domain-specific intent classification

Demographic Markers

Author profiling from text patterns

Active Research Hypotheses

From Early Development to Production: Testing the Viability of Hostable Ensemble Models

The Dual Challenge

Scientific Depth

"Understanding" is not a single task but a complex, multi-dimensional construct requiring validated models across personality, emotion, intent, and profiling.

Engineering Practicality

The resulting model must be "hostable"—strict adherence to computational budgets for memory, latency, and cost at inference time.

Key Hypotheses Under Investigation

H1
Data Fusion Strategy

Question: Can we synthetically create a larger Big Five corpus by mapping the data-rich MBTI datasets to scientifically validated traits?

Gold Standard: Big Five (OCEAN) model
Challenge: Scarce labeled data
Alternative: MBTI (data-rich, lower rigor)
H2
Quantization Tolerance

Question: What is the minimum quantization level (8-bit, 4-bit, NF4) that preserves semantic understanding quality while fitting within an 8-16 GB VRAM budget?

Constraint: Full precision (7B model) = 28 GB
Goal: Hostable on single consumer GPU
H3
Ensemble Architecture

Question: Does a heterogeneous stacking ensemble with task-specific specialist models outperform a single multi-task transformer?

Hypothesis: Boosting for low-data (personality)
Hypothesis: Specialists for domain intent
H4
Latency vs. Accuracy Trade-off

Question: Can we achieve <100ms latency for the full understanding vector while maintaining F1 scores >0.85 across all dimensions?

Target: Real-time inference
Optimization: Prefill stage (not decode)
H5
Private Deployment Viability

Question: Is fine-tuned, locally-deployed model accuracy competitive with third-party LLM APIs while ensuring data privacy and reducing long-term costs?

Privacy: No external API calls
Fairness: Domain-specific fine-tuning reduces bias
H6
Bias Mitigation

Question: Can audited, domain-specific fine-tuned models demonstrably reduce intersectional bias compared to general-purpose LLMs in high-stakes contexts?

Evidence: General LLMs amplify hiring bias
Solution: Fine-tuned, audited models

Current Status

Customized implementation of the 3rd-party LLM approach is available today for enterprise deployment.

Further experimentation for private user understanding models is pending market demand and partnership opportunities to validate production viability.

Full Research Paper Hostable Ensemble Models Framework

User Understanding in the Conway Ecosystem

Deployed across multiple production applications and research demonstrations

Euphie
Production Deployment

A joy-focused todo list that understands its users for more effective scheduling, task automation, and ultimately joy. User Understanding powers personalized time management by adapting to personality traits, emotional states, and individual productivity patterns.

Intelligent scheduling based on user understanding
Automated task prioritization for joy maximization
Personality-aware productivity recommendations
Dating Application Demo
Research Demonstration

Proof-of-concept implementation demonstrating LLM-driven semantic matching as an alternative to collaborative filtering, addressing bias amplification and misaligned incentives.

Pairwise trade-off analysis
Semantic filtering vs. keyword matching
Explainable compatibility scores

Deep Dive: LLM-Driven Semantic Matching

A comprehensive technical and strategic analysis of the LLM-driven framework, including computational challenges, bias mitigation strategies, and the architectural shift from exhaustive comparison to hybrid retrieve-and-rerank systems.

Live Demonstration

Experience personality profile generation powered by User Understanding technology.

Demo Budget Notice: This demonstration will stop working after $200 of total LLM spend. Help keep this research accessible by donating to support ongoing demonstration costs.

Enterprise Personalization Tooling

Interested in next-level personalization for your platform? User Understanding technology is available for enterprise licensing and custom deployment.

Privacy-First

Private-cloud or locally-deployed architecture with no external API dependencies

Bias-Audited

Domain-specific fine-tuning and algorithmic auditing for fairness

Production-Ready

Optimized for latency, throughput, and cost-efficient inference

Initiate Partnership Discussion